Trump opens the skies: US aims for 1,000 launches per year, and SpaceX already holds the cards
Trump signed a new policy that marks a dramatic shift in the American space market: The US wants to increase its space launch and re-entry capability from 178 events in 2025 to over 1,000 launches and re-entries annually by 2030.
This is not just another speech about "conquering space."
This is an attempt to turn space into commercial infrastructure on an industrial scale.
Note the numbers -178 - 1,000+.
This is an increase of more than 5-fold within four years.
For this to happen, the government cannot simply tell companies "launch more." The entire road leading to space needs to be built: Opening federal lands for new launch and re-entry sites. Identifying a new federal re-entry site within 90 days. Accelerating launch and re-entry approvals. Shortening environmental procedures. Allocating communication frequencies. Creating shared infrastructure with private companies. Integrating space activities into the air traffic control system. Prioritizing launch corridors in airspace.
In other words, Washington is trying to solve the bottleneck not just on the rocket side, but on the side of all the infrastructure that allows the rocket to reach space.
And then comes SpaceX
Here the story becomes much more interesting.
In 2025, 178 launches were recorded in the US, and SpaceX performed 170 of them according to the data provided. 170 out of 178.
This is no longer a "leading player."
This is almost complete dominance.
And at the same time, the company is aiming for a huge future launch rate.
If the US truly moves from 178 to over 1,000 launch and re-entry events per year, SpaceX is not starting the race from the first line.
It is already on the track.
But here begins the story that interests investors
This move is not just about rockets.
It can open the door to the entire value chain of the space industry: Rocket Lab - $RKLB one of the interesting public players in the launch sector, with increasingly broad activity around satellites, space systems, and infrastructure. AstraNova - $ASTRN exposure to the space industry through systems and components for space missions. Intuitive Machines - $LUNR one of the prominent companies in lunar infrastructure and robotic landing services. Redwire - $RDW develops components, systems, and infrastructure for spacecraft and space missions. Virgin Galactic - $SPCE exposure to the commercial spaceflight sector, although this involves a particularly high-risk profile. BlackSky - $BKSY activity in the field of observation and intelligence satellites from space. Planet Labs - $PL operates a constellation of satellites for collecting Earth observation data.
And the important point: not every one of these companies is a "good space stock."
Some are very speculative.
Some are still far from significant profitability.
And some may benefit from the process only indirectly.
But this is precisely why the story is interesting.
The policy directly connects the commercial industry to the American Moon and Mars program. Goals include returning American astronauts to the Moon by 2028, building initial lunar infrastructure by 2030, and expanding the use of commercial transportation services to the Moon and Mars.
The implication is a change in model: instead of the government building every system itself, it wants private companies to provide an increasing share of the services.
The government becomes a customer. Companies become infrastructure providers.
And this is precisely where investors need to start thinking beyond the rocket.
Because if the number of missions jumps severalfold, the one who profits will not necessarily be only the one who sells the rocket.
Money can also flow to those who sell: The systems. The sensors. The communications. The propulsion. The electronics. The ground stations. The software. The satellites. And the landing and operating systems.
But what really stands behind the space race - a huge exclusive study coming soon.
We are monitoring